Making minor deities disappear in a puff of logic since 1972
Mon, 21 Apr 2008
I've been thinking about buying a Canon lens to replace the somewhat inadequate kit lens that came with my Canon XTI.
So I posted on an expert forum asking about two lenses, and got some interesting advice, most of which was along the lines I had predicted.
But one poster pointed out that I might have a gap in my focal lengths by having a 10-22mm lens (a lens I might buy down the line) and a 24-xmm lens (where x: {70,105}mm). The suggestion was to use a piece of software called "ExposurePlot" to determine if the kinds of pictures I shot fell into the 22-24mm range. Now, that's a narrow range, but still a valid point.
The poster suggested I use a program called "ExposurePlot", which, it turns out is a Windows program that analyzes EXIF data from your pictures to determine focal length of your exposures, and then generates a scatter plot. Blech.
But never fear, OS X and Unix is here, and a perfect opportunity to blog about it (note, the following steps assume you are relatively comfortable with the Unix terminal):
rus -http://rus.berrett.org/blog/- writes: interesting topic...
I ran your find command (using -iname instead of -name) and produced a beautiful graph of focal lengths versus exposure counts for pictures taken with my Canon EOS 30D. I have the stock 18-55mm lens, so my range is much more narrow than yours. Check it out here: http://rus.berrett.org/pics/2008/focal_length_graph.jpg
Khan -- writes: Curious...
Very interesting to see that your chart mirrors mine... that there is a surplus of exposures fully zoomed in. What this tells me is, if we had lenses that had greater telephoto, we probably would have used them...